Focus and Scope
Folia Malacologica, a journal open to academics all over the world, offers itself as a new site for the presentation and discussion of the most recent results in the field of research on Molluscs. The official journal of The Association of Plish Malacologists, Folia Malacologica publishes original works – extended articles, short notes and book reviews – only in English, dealing with the biology, ecology and diversity of Molluscs.
Folia Malacologica publishes four issues per year, and it is abstracted/indexed in the following databases:
- AGRO
- Zoological Records
- CAB Abstracts
Section Policies
Articles
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
Folia Malacologica is published quarterly as an international journal devoted to all aspects of malacology. Papers are submitted with an understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and are not being considered for publication elsewhere (exception: abstracts published in connection with conferences). Acceptable language for publication is English.
It is assumed that all people listed as authors of submitted papers meet both basic authorship criteria: (1) they contributed substantially to study planning, data collection or interpretation of results; and (2) wrote or critically revised the paper. It is also assumed that all people listed as authors are aware of it and have agreed to be listed. On the other hand, it is assumed that no person who meets the authorship criteria has been omitted. Moreover, all people who are not listed as authors but contributed substantially to the study reported in submitted paper or assisted in its writing (e.g. language professionals) should be mentioned in the acknowledgements, with their agreement. Finally, all sources of funding for the study reported in the submitted papers should be revealed.
Acting against the above rules, especially every discovered case of scientific misconduct (ghostwriting, guest authorship, etc.), will be treated seriously by Editors. They will inform scientific bodies and/or employers of dishonest authors about it.
All submitted papers are initially evaluated by Editors according to the following criteria: compatibility of paper topic with journal policy, paper originality, importance and timeliness. The papers with insufficient priority are rejected. The other papers are sent to at least two expert referees for peer review. Peer referee identities are kept confidential, but author identities are known to referees. The existence of a paper under review is not revealed to anyone other than peer referees and editorial staff. Final decision is made by Editors after receiving all referee opinions. The authors are informed about paper acceptance or rejection within two–three months.
Copyright © 2013 Folia Malacologica. All Rights Reserved.